Polymarket, the cryptocurrency-based prediction market, has a market that was predicting whether or not or not Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy would “wear a suit before July.”
This market was imagined to resolve positively if Zelenskyy “is photographed or videotaped wearing a suit between May 22 and June 30, 2025 ET.”
This market has grow to be terribly controversial after Zelenskyy appeared at an occasion sporting a non-traditional go well with.
Learn extra: DOGE lies break Polymarket prediction market
Zelenskyy attended a North Atlantic Treaty Group (NATO) occasion on June 24 in a jacket and pants that gave the impression to be reduce from the identical cloth, although with a considerably much less conventional form than basic Western tailoring.
The British Broadcasting Company (BBC) famous in an replace on the occasion that “Zelenskyy swaps military fatigues for black suit at Nato summit.”
The New York Put up ran a headline that said, “Zelenskyy ditches t-shirt for a suit for sit-down meeting with President Trump.”
Even Polymarket Intel, an official Polymarket account, described a video of Zelenskyy’s arrival as “President Zelenskyy in a suit last night.”
Learn extra: Why Polymarket customers are betting that Jesus Christ will return
But, regardless of many entities, together with an official Polymarket account, declaring it a go well with, it nonetheless appears as if the market might resolve to say that “No.”
How does Polymarket determine it’s a go well with?
Customers can bond their belongings to the UMA oracle associated to that market and counsel a decision. Initially, customers prompt this market ought to resolve to “Yes.”
Different customers can dispute this decision for a quick window after it’s proposed by bonding their belongings as a problem.
There was an preliminary dispute that challenged the “Yes” decision, with numerous UMA customers stating that it was too early to resolve this market.
This decision means the disputant receives their bonded belongings again, in addition to half the bonded belongings of the one that initially proposed the “Yes” decision. The unique proposer loses their bonded belongings.
The subsequent part shall be one other proposal for the result and sure one other remaining dispute the place customers will bond their belongings to vote on the result. It’s not completely clear how this may find yourself resolving.
Polymarket, the protocol, has no view of actuality, and dealing as designed will merely resolve the market in line with the choice of the oracle — even when the oracle finally ends up making a call that seems to run opposite to the said description of how the market ought to resolve.
Nonetheless, there have been different markets during which Polymarket, the agency, has intervened. An earlier market debated whether or not or not DOGE would “cut $3b of DEI contracts before March.”
This market was meant to resolve to “Yes” if doge-tracker.com confirmed greater than $3 billion in cuts to DEI contracts.
This tracker did find yourself displaying giant financial savings, however the market closed, and all losses had been refunded, not as a result of the decision situation wasn’t met, however as a result of Polymarket determined that doge-tracker.com itself wasn’t a dependable supply.
What these two separate circumstances reveal is the stress between the customers of Polymarket, the customers prepared to bond for UMA oracle disputes, and Polymarket, the agency, which intends for Polymarket to look extra decentralized than it has been prior to now.
Received a tip? Ship us an electronic mail securely through Protos Leaks. For extra knowledgeable information, comply with us on X, Bluesky, and Google Information, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.